Knowledge Mobilization
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Browsing Knowledge Mobilization by Author "637742c6683fd6515b5a2f0b74328d13"
Now showing 1 - 6 of 6
Results Per Page
Sort Options
Item Open Access A Field Note Describing the Development and Dissemination of Clear Language Research Summaries for University-Based Knowledge Mobilization(Scholarly & Research Communications, 2012-10-09) Phipps, David; Jensen, Krista; Johnny, Michael; Myers, GaryObjectives: The outputs of academic research are often written in technical language that is not accessible or useful to non-academic audiences. We set out to develop and disseminate clear language research summaries as one element of York University’s Knowledge Mobilization (KMb) strategy. This field note describes how we developed, evaluated, and disseminated clear language research summaries as tools for research outreach and communication. Methods and Results: We worked under the auspices of a Steering Committee of research stakeholders and under the instruction of a clear language writing and design specialist to develop research summaries in a format that would comply with clear language writing and design principles. This format was tested in roundtables of diverse research stakeholders and has received positive feedback from diverse research users. The research summaries were made accessible online and disseminated using a social media strategy. The use of Twitter to enhance dissemination of the research summaries increased web traffic to the research summary database by 270%. Conclusions: We find that clear language research summaries are appealing to non-academic decision-makers and can be used to disseminate research findings to a wide online audience. Based on this feedback we have adopted this standard research summary format as part of an institutional knowledge mobilization strategy. Providing greater access to research summaries has the potential to connect decision-makers and communities to academic researchers, which ultimately helps academic research to inform decision-making.Item Open Access An institutional Process for Brokering community-campus research collaborations(University of Saskatoon, 2015-05) Phipps, David; Johnny, Michael; Wedlock, JaneKnowledge mobilization seeks to identify and support authentic research collaborations between community and university so that benefits of the research accrue to both partners. Knowledge brokering is a key knowledge mobilization mechanism that helps community and university partners connect and build relationships in order to share expertise for mutual opportunity. There remains a need to describe in detail the typical knowledge brokering devices and methodologies. This paper presents a detailed description of York University’s knowledge brokering service which is based on eight years of knowledge mobilization practice. The process is broken into 5 broad stages: 1) in progress; 2) no match; 3) match and no activity; 4) match and activity; 5) match and project. Stage 5 includes a step to identify the non-academic impacts of the collaborative research project. This process is illustrated using examples from York University’s practice in which a match was brokered for 82% of the 342 knowledge mobilization opportunities received between 2006-2014. York University partners with United Way York Region (UWYR) to create a regional approach to knowledge mobilization supports. This paper illustrates the impacts on community and university knowledge mobilization partners following the introduction of a community-based knowledge broker at UWYR.Item Open Access Knowledge Translation and Strategic Communications: Unpacking Differences and Similarities for Scholarly and Research Communications(CCSP Press, 2014-11-12) Barwick, Melanie; Phipps, David; Coriandoli, Rossana; Johnny, Michael; Myers, GaryKnowledge translation (KT) involves communication of research evidence. Within research-relevant organizations there is considerable overlap in the roles and activities associated with KT and strategic communications (SC), which calls for greater role clarity. We untangle the differences and similarities between KT and SC, bringing clarity that may benefit organizations employing both types of workers. As KT practitioners (KTPs) take hold in organizations that have long had SC personnel, there is tension but also opportunities for defining roles and exploring synergies. What follows is a description of how we have explored this duality within our networks and an analysis of how SC and KT roles are similar and divergent.Item Open Access Lessons learned from knowledge mobilisation: turning research into action(The Association of Commonwealth Universities, 09-Jun) Zanotti, Daniele; Johnny, Michael; Phipps, DavidItem Open Access Science for Society(International Innvoation, 2015-09-23) Phipps, David; Johnny, Michael; Jensen, KristaThe Government of Canada’s new science, technology & innovation strategy means universities must adopt a fresh approach to complement technology transfer and industry liaison. ResearchImpact-RéseauImpactRecherche, a network of 11 Canadian universities, is working hard to support this new approach through knowledge mobilisationItem Open Access Student internships bridge research to real world problems(Emerald Group Publishing, 11-Jan) Hynie, Michaela; Jensen, Krista; Johnny, Michael; Wedlock, Jane; Phipps, DavidPurpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate whether unstructured graduate student research internships conducted in collaboration with community agencies build capacity and knowledge for students and community.