Sacrifice or Salvation: How can Animal Lives be Spared and Human Health Improved by Toxics Reform?

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorAli, Syed Harris
dc.contributor.authorWordsworth, Anne Marie
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-28T21:14:07Z
dc.date.available2023-03-28T21:14:07Z
dc.date.copyright2022-10-28
dc.date.issued2023-03-28
dc.date.updated2023-03-28T21:14:07Z
dc.degree.disciplineEnvironmental Studies
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractThis dissertation investigates the complexities of the entwined relations between animal cognition, the use of animals in toxicity testing, and the proliferation and impacts of harmful chemicals in our society. It asks how, in light of the most current research on animal sentience and the ethics of responsibility, a reorientation of chemical testing at a theoretical, ethical and practical level could spare animal suffering and improve human health outcomes. Its starting point is the unfolding scientific research on animal cognition, and the consequent implications for reconsidering the ethical relationships, historically established and currently assumed, between human and non-human animals. The central issue, which infuses this dissertation, is whether humans are obliged by this knowledge to expand our moral arena to encompass animals, to acknowledge their entitlement not to be used for toxicity experimentation, and the implications of such an entitlement for the future use of animals in toxicity testing. The work is based on a social constructivist process centred on the multiple facets of toxicity testing – the philosophical viewpoints of those who have expressed concern for the well-being of animals, governments’ animal protection laws that fail to spare animals from painful experimentation, toxics laws that promote the use of animals in toxicity tests, the pain and suffering of the tests themselves, the championing of the mouse as the favoured animal for experimentation, and the limitations and failure of toxicity testing itself to safeguard public health and the environment from widespread contamination. In addition, this examination of toxicity testing looks at the potential differences between advocates of expanded testing of toxic chemicals and animal advocates concerned about the implications of expanded testing for the increased use of animals. Finally, building on qualitative methods for assessing the current state of knowledge regarding the use of animals in toxicity testing, this dissertation evaluates how this system could be redrawn to both spare animals and better gauge the toxicity of chemicals.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/40965
dc.languageen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectEnvironmental law
dc.subjectAnimal behavior
dc.subjectEnvironmental health
dc.subject.keywordsToxicity testing
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal cognition
dc.subject.keywordsAnimal protection laws
dc.subject.keywordsTranscorporeality
dc.subject.keywordsToxics laws
dc.subject.keywordsNon-animal alternative methods
dc.titleSacrifice or Salvation: How can Animal Lives be Spared and Human Health Improved by Toxics Reform?
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertation

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Wordsworth_Anne_M_2022_PhD.pdf
Size:
1.27 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.87 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.39 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Environmental Studies

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.