"Attorney-General of Canada v. Ward"

dc.contributor.authorPetrasek, David
dc.contributor.authorEgan, Suzanne
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-17T01:22:44Z
dc.date.available2011-10-17T01:22:44Z
dc.date.issued1990
dc.description.abstractThe decision of the Federal Court of Appeal in the Ward case raises numerous issues of fundamental importance in the determination of claims to refugee status. It is widely perceived that the majority decision represents a narrow and restrictive interpretation of key provisions in the Convention refugee definition as incorporated in Canadian law. The following discussion is intended to provide a commentary on Ward, and, to provide a framework within which the issues raised in the case can be understood.
dc.identifier.citationDavid Petrasek and Suzanne Egan, "Attorney-General of Canada v. Ward," Refugee Law Research Unit, Osgoode Hall Law School, York University, 1990.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/10020
dc.language.isoenen
dc.publisherOsgoode Law Research Unit, York University
dc.title"Attorney-General of Canada v. Ward"en
dc.typeArticle

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Petrasek.Egan(S)-2.pdf
Size:
804.33 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: