Interrogating Safeguards Under the Mental Health Act: Criticizing the Decision in Thompson and Empowerment Council v. Ontario (2013): Towards an Alternative Understanding of Psychiatric Disability From the Perspectives of Critical Disability Theories and Crispitemology

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorda Silveira Gorman, Rachel
dc.contributor.advisorVorstermans, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorHan, Yoonmee
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T23:10:43Z
dc.date.available2022-07-06T23:10:43Z
dc.date.issued2021-11
dc.descriptionMajor Research Paper (Master's), Critical Disability Studies, School of Health Policy and Management,Faculty of Health, York University
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/39524
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.rightsThe copyright for the paper content remains with the author.
dc.subjectPsychiatric disabilityen_US
dc.subjectCritical disability theoryen_US
dc.subjectCripistemologyen_US
dc.subjectMental Health Acten_US
dc.subjectThompson and Empowerment Council v Ontario (2013)en_US
dc.titleInterrogating Safeguards Under the Mental Health Act: Criticizing the Decision in Thompson and Empowerment Council v. Ontario (2013): Towards an Alternative Understanding of Psychiatric Disability From the Perspectives of Critical Disability Theories and Crispitemologyen_US
dc.typeMajor Research Paper

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Han, Yoonmee MRP 2021.pdf
Size:
487.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description:
Download

Collections

Major Research Papers - Critical Disability Studies

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.