The Supreme Court Needs to Consider Both Common Law and Aboriginal Law When Resolving Land Disputes

Simple item page
dc.contributor.authorMcNeil, Kent
dc.date.accessioned2015-05-21T17:50:17Z
dc.date.available2015-05-21T17:50:17Z
dc.date.issued2008
dc.descriptionen_US
dc.description.abstractThe Delgamuukw approach to resolving Aboriginal land claims is superior to both a strict common law approach and a strict Aboriginal law approach. It acknowledges the unique qualities of Aboriginal title, and provides Aboriginal peoples with the legal support for their inherent right of self-government.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipYork's Knowledge Mobilization Unit provides services and funding for faculty, graduate students, and community organizations seeking to maximize the impact of academic research and expertise on public policy, social programming, and professional practice. It is supported by SSHRC and CIHR grants, and by the Office of the Vice-President Research & Innovation. kmbunit@yorku.ca www.researchimpact.caen_US
dc.identifier00015
dc.identifier.citationMcNeil, K. (2006). Aboriginal title and the Supreme Court: What’s happening? Saskatchewan Law Review, 69, 281-308.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/29100
dc.relationYork Universityen_US
dc.relation.urien_US
dc.rightsAttribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.5 Canadaen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/en_US
dc.subjectLawen_US
dc.subjectFirst Nationsen_US
dc.titleThe Supreme Court Needs to Consider Both Common Law and Aboriginal Law When Resolving Land Disputesen_US
dc.typeResearch Summaryen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
00015.pdf
Size:
260.02 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download

Collections

Research Summaries

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.