Making Sense of Mitigation Used to Address Industrial Effects on Wildlife in Canadian Environmental Assessments

Simple item page
dc.contributor.advisorFraser, Gail
dc.creatorElvin, Sandra Sarah
dc.date.accessioned2015-08-28T14:36:48Z
dc.date.available2015-08-28T14:36:48Z
dc.date.copyright2013-11-26
dc.date.issued2015-08-28
dc.date.updated2015-08-28T14:36:48Z
dc.degree.disciplineEnvironmental Studies
dc.degree.levelDoctoral
dc.degree.namePhD - Doctor of Philosophy
dc.description.abstractWithin a given industrial project, adverse environmental effects are a likely occurrence. Current environmental sustainability doctrine in Canada suggests that adverse environmental effects need to be adequately addressed in order to be avoided or minimized. The Environmental Assessment (EA) process has been developed to provide a systematic means for effects analysis and to cultivate mitigation programs to offset adverse effects. However, the progress of EAs often leads to development of industry with inadequate regard for mitigation for wildlife and their habitats. To better understand the mechanisms of mitigation programs used to offset effects to wildlife in the Canadian EA process, I established three studies consisting of quantitative and qualitative methods of inquiry. In the first study, I interviewed mitigation experts on their use and perceptions of success of various mitigation programs. I found that programs used by experts in different occupation groups differ in terms of frequency of use. Further, the overall pattern for perception of success of mitigation programs remained consistent. Experts were hesitant to label any mitigation program as reliably successful in offsetting adverse environmental effects. Second, I examined the role of an informational tool in informing EAs and subsequent mitigation. Using a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats analysis, I evaluated the telemetry tool. I found that a specific set of support systems is needed to implement telemetry on a useful basis. Last, I used data from experts’ knowledge interviews to unearth trends in mitigation practices. I used this information to develop policy and operational recommendations for improving the Canadian EA process. I conclude this dissertation with a synthesis chapter that demonstrates the contributions of these studies, and provides suggestions for future research.
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/29812
dc.language.isoen
dc.rightsAuthor owns copyright, except where explicitly noted. Please contact the author directly with licensing requests.
dc.subjectEnvironmental studies
dc.subject.keywordsCanadian Environmental Assessment
dc.subject.keywordsMitigation
dc.subject.keywordsEnvironmental effects
dc.subject.keywordsTelemetry
dc.subject.keywordsSWOT
dc.titleMaking Sense of Mitigation Used to Address Industrial Effects on Wildlife in Canadian Environmental Assessments
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertationen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Elvin_Sandra_S_2013_PhD.pdf
Size:
1.53 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Download
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 2 of 2
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
YorkU_ETDlicense.txt
Size:
3.38 KB
Format:
Plain Text
Description:
Download

Collections

Environmental Studies

All items in the YorkSpace institutional repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved except where explicitly noted.