Emotion Does Not Have to Cause Harm to an Argument
dc.contributor.author | Gilbert, Michael | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-05-21T20:57:05Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-05-21T20:57:05Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | |
dc.description.abstract | The presence of emotion does not necessarily harm an argument. Emotion can play a role in traditional, logic-based theories of argumentation. | en_US |
dc.description.sponsorship | York's Knowledge Mobilization Unit provides services and funding for faculty, graduate students, and community organizations seeking to maximize the impact of academic research and expertise on public policy, social programming, and professional practice. It is supported by SSHRC and CIHR grants, and by the Office of the Vice-President Research & Innovation. kmbunit@yorku.ca www.researchimpact.ca | en_US |
dc.identifier.citation | Gilbert, M. A. (2004). Emotion, argumentation & informal logic. Informal Logic, 24(3). | en_US |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10315/29309 | |
dc.rights | Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.5 Canada | en_US |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ca/ | en_US |
dc.subject | Communication | en_US |
dc.title | Emotion Does Not Have to Cause Harm to an Argument | en_US |