Gender, sexuality and the discursive representation of access and equity in health services literature: Implications for LGBT communities

dc.contributor.authorDaley, Andrea
dc.contributor.authorMacDonnell, Judith A.
dc.date.accessioned2016-09-14T17:55:51Z
dc.date.available2016-09-14T17:55:51Z
dc.date.issued2011
dc.description.abstractBackground This article considers how health services access and equity documents represent the problem of access to health services and what the effects of that representation might be for lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) communities. We conducted a critical discourse analysis on selected access and equity documents using a gender-based diversity framework as determined by two objectives: 1) to identify dominant and counter discourses in health services access and equity literature; and 2) to develop understanding of how particular discourses impact the inclusion, or not, of LGBT communities in health services access and equity frameworks.The analysis was conducted in response to public health and clinical research that has documented barriers to health services access for LGBT communities including institutionalized heterosexism, biphobia, and transphobia, invisibility and lack of health provider knowledge and comfort. The analysis was also conducted as the first step of exploring LGBT access issues in home care services for LGBT populations in Ontario, Canada. Methods A critical discourse analysis of selected health services access and equity documents, using a gender-based diversity framework, was conducted to offer insight into dominant and counter discourses underlying health services access and equity initiatives. Results A continuum of five discourses that characterize the health services access and equity literature were identified including two dominant discourses: 1) multicultural discourse, and 2) diversity discourse; and three counter discourses: 3) social determinants of health (SDOH) discourse; 4) anti-oppression (AOP) discourse; and 5) citizen/social rights discourse. Conclusions The analysis offers a continuum of dominant and counter discourses on health services access and equity as determined from a gender-based diversity perspective. The continuum of discourses offers a framework to identify and redress organizational assumptions about, and ideological commitments to, sexual and gender diversity and health services access and equity. Thus, the continuum of discourses may serve as an important element of a health care organization's access and equity framework for the evaluation of access to good quality care for diverse LGBT populations. More specfically, the analysis offers four important points of consideration in relation to the development of a health services access and equity framework.en_US
dc.identifier.citationDaley, A., & MacDonnell, J.A. (2011). Gender, sexuality and the discursive representation of access and equity in health services literature: Implications for LGBT communities. International Journal for Equity in Health, 10 (40), 1-10.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1475-9276
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10315/32046
dc.identifier.urihttp://doi.org/10.1186/1475-9276-10-40
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_US
dc.rights.journalhttp://equityhealthj.biomedcentral.com/en_US
dc.titleGender, sexuality and the discursive representation of access and equity in health services literature: Implications for LGBT communitiesen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Files

Original bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
gender-sexuality-and-the-discursive-representation-of-access-and-equity.pdf
Size:
446.08 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Article
License bundle
Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
No Thumbnail Available
Name:
license.txt
Size:
1.83 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: