Babu, Abraham SamuelHeald, Fiorella A.Contractor, AashishLima de Melo Ghisi, GabrielaBuckley, JohnMola, AnnaAtrey, AlisonLopez-Jimenez, FranciscoGrace, Sherry2023-02-102023-02-102022-05Babu, A., Heald, F., Contractor, A., Ghisi, G., Buckley, J., Mola, A., Atrey, A., Lopez-Jimenez, F., & Grace, S. (2022). Building Capacity Through ICCPR Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Foundations Certification (CRFC). Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 42 (3), 178-182. doi: 10.1097/HCR.00000000000006551932-75011932-751Xhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000655http://hdl.handle.net/10315/40874Purpose: The International Council of Cardiac Rehabilitation and Prevention (ICCPR) developed an online Cardiac Rehabilitation Foundations Certification (CRFC; https://globalcardiacrehab.com/Certification) in October 2017, to build CR delivery capacity in low-resource settings based on their guidelines. Herein we evaluate its’ reach globally, barriers to its completion, as well as satisfaction and impact of the course among those completing it. Methods: The country of origin of all applicants was tallied. An online survey was developed for learners who completed the CRFC (completers), and for those who applied but did not yet complete the program (non-completers), administered using Google Forms. Results: With regard to reach, 236 applications were received from 23/203 (11.3%) countries; 51 (25%) were from low or middle-income countries. 130 (55.1%) have completed the CRFC; mean scores on the final exam were 88.3 ± 7.1%, with no difference by country income classification (P=.052). Sixteen (21.9%) non-completers and 37 (34.3%) completers responded to the survey. Barriers reported by non-completers were time constraints, cost, and technical issues. Overall satisfaction with the CRFC was high (4.49 ± 0.51/5); most completers would highly recommend the CRFC to others (4.30 ± 0.66), and perceived that the information provided will contribute to their work and/or the care of their patients (4.38 ± 0.89); 29 (78.4%) had used the information from the CRFC in their practice. Conclusions: The reach of the CRFC still needs to be broadened, in particular in low-resource settings. Learners are highly satisfied with the certification, and its impacts on CR practice are encouraging. Input has been implemented to improve the CRFC.enThis is a Final Peer-Reviewed Manuscript of an article published in final form in Babu, A., Heald, F., Contractor, A., Ghisi, G., Buckley, J., Mola, A., Atrey, A., Lopez-Jimenez, F., & Grace, S. (2022). Building Capacity Through ICCPR Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Foundations Certification (CRFC). Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention, 42 (3), 178-182. doi: 10.1097/HCR.0000000000000655.Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 InternationalCardiac rehabilitationCertificationProgram evaluationContinuing educationHuman resources workforceBuilding Capacity through ICCPR’s Cardiovascular Rehabilitation Foundations Certification (CRFC): Evaluation of Reach, Barriers and ImpactICCPR CR Foundations Certification EvaluationArticle