Philosophical Enquiries
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
Item Open Access How to Pair the Real Numbers with the Integers - a Précis of the Proof(2023-02-06) Cameron, Evan Wm.Item Open Access Psychopathology, Personal Identity and David Hume(1978) Cameron, Evan Wm.Consider our idea of 'personal identity'. Of what simple ideas is it compounded, and from what impressions are they derived? David Hume was unable to answer the questions to his own satisfaction, and yet he could have answered them, I think, and many more, had he considered the implications of an off-hand remark that he made early on within his Treatise of Human Nature: " . . . in madness . . . our ideas may approach to our impressions" (page 2), for what is 'madness', succinctly, but a loss of personal identity? Hume's Treatise of Human Nature is mistitled, for it remains unconcerned with the possible abnormalities of the mind. I suggest within this essay, however, that had Hume considered the possibilities of abnormality implicit in his theory of the normal mind, he could not only have solved the problem of personal identity but established with remarkable accuracy the foundations of psychopathology as well.Item Open Access How to Pair the Real Numbers with the Integers: a Game of Kitchen Mathematics.pdf(2023) Cameron, Evan Wm.;Can one pair the real numbers with the integers? I believe so, believing as well that the proof follows so simply from the work of Abraham Robinson a half-century ago that neither he nor readers thereafter, minds on other matters, noticed. Had they done so, they would have realised that the pairing obliterates the conclusion and methods of Georg Cantor's 'proofs' to the contrary and therewith his insistence that sets are required for comprehending mathematics, for were there 'no more real numbers than integers', we should have no reason to suppose that there are uncountably many things of any kind within our world, numbers included, and hence no need for them. Within this essay, I prove the pairing, unpack the flaws in Cantor's 3rd 'proof' and sketch the 'religious' passion that drive him to ignore them.Item Open Access Pudovkin's Precept [Summary]: Pudovkin, Kant and the Transcendental Unity of Apperception(1990) Cameron, Evan Wm.In 1926, Vsevolod Pudovkin solved the fundamental problem of film design by showing filmmakers how to select and order the parts of a movie (its shots, scenes and sequences of them) to ensure that viewers can perceive coherently and with least effort the events that they encounter by means of it. He did so by unwittingly bringing Kant's transcendental constraint of apperceptive unity to bear upon it, confirming with unprecedented elegance and power that respect for the constraints of the self-conscious perceptual integrity of observers is the primal precondition of authentic art. Within this address, I summarise Pudovkin's achievement and its Kantian context, condensing the story told within Parts 1-3 of the lectures on 'Pudovkin's Precept' available within the Evan Wm. Cameron Collection.Item Open Access Pudovkin's Precept, Part 3: Bringing Movies to Kant's 'Transcendental Unity of Apperception'(1987) Cameron, Evan Wm.In 1926, Vsevolod Pudovkin, a not-so-young Russian of thirty-two making his first movie of feature length, articulated within a brief manual for filmmakers how to solve the fundamental problem of film design by describing how to select and order the parts of a movie (its shots, scenes and sequences) to ensure that viewers can perceive coherently and with least effort the events that they encounter by means of them. How did he do it? How, indeed, could anyone have done it, much less an inexperienced filmmaker, accomplishing a feat of a kind unprecedented within commentaries by others upon any other art? To answer those questions is to comprehend not only the rudiments of how filmmakers make movies but the distinctive nature of the art of filmmaking itself. Within the lectures on 'Pudovkin's Precept . . .' available within the Evan Wm. Cameron Collection, I address those questions in order and with increasing refinement, unpacking in Part 3 how Pudovkin was able to do what he did only by unwittingly bringing Kant's transcendental constraint of apperceptive unity to bear upon the making of movies, confirming that respect for the constraints of the self-conscious perceptual integrity of observers is the primal precondition of achievement within every art.Item Open Access Pudovkin's Precept, Part 2: 'This Method of Temporal Concentration'(1977) Cameron, Evan Wm.In 1926, Vsevolod Pudovkin, a not-so-young Russian of thirty-two making his first movie of feature length, articulated within a brief manual for filmmakers how to solve the fundamental problem of film design by describing how to select and order the parts of a movie (its shots, scenes and sequences) to ensure that viewers can perceive coherently and with least effort the events that they encounter by means of them. How did he do it? How, indeed, could anyone have done it, much less an inexperienced filmmaker, accomplishing a feat of a kind unprecedented within commentaries by others upon any other art? To answer those questions is to comprehend not only the rudiments of how filmmakers make movies but the distinctive nature of the art of filmmaking itself. Within the lectures on 'Pudovkin's Precept . . .' available within the Evan Wm. Cameron Collection, I address those questions in order and with increasing refinement, unpacking in Part 2 how the precept, when understood as comprehensibly as Pudovkin would have wished, imposes additional requirements upon the making of movies intended to be 'works of art' – constraints within which too few filmmakers have been able and willing to work.Item Open Access Pudovkin's Precept, Part 1: the 'Basic Method' of Filmmaking(1967) Cameron, Evan Wm.In 1926, Vsevolod Pudovkin, a not-so-young Russian of thirty-two making his first movie of feature length, articulated within a brief manual for filmmakers how to solve the fundamental problem of film design by describing how to select and order the parts of a movie (its shots, scenes and sequences) to ensure that viewers can perceive coherently and with least effort the events that they encounter by means of them. How did he do it? How, indeed, could anyone have done it, much less an inexperienced filmmaker, accomplishing a feat of a kind unprecedented within commentaries by others upon any other art? To answer those questions is to comprehend not only the rudiments of how filmmakers make movies but the distinctive nature of the art of filmmaking itself. Within the lectures on 'Pudovkin's Precept . . .' available within the Evan Wm. Cameron Collection, I address those questions in order and with increasing refinement, unpacking in Part 1 how filmmakers came commonly to comprehend and use what Pudovkin said – the most significant prescription in the history of filmmaking.Item Open Access Kant and the Ontological Argument(1965) Cameron, Evan Wm.An essay reaffirming Kant's criticism of the ontological argument for the existence of God – a conjecture conceived in the 11th century by Anselm of Canterbury and defended in the mid-20th century by Charles Hartshorne and Norman Malcolm.Item Open Access God, Kant and the Transcendental Object: an Investigation into the Kantian Critique of the Ontological Argument(1965) Cameron, Evan Wm.An address to the 4th International Kant Congress, Mainz, Germany, 8 April 1974 on the nature and consequences of Kant's remarks within his Critique of Pure Reason on the notions of 'God' and the 'Transcendental Object', a text of which was published later the same year within the proceedings of the Congress as pages 347-355 of the Akten des 4 International Kant Kongresses, Mainz 6 10 April 1974, Teil II.1 (Berlin, Germany: Walter de Gruyter, 1974).Item Open Access A Prescriptive Criterion for Distinguishing Analytic from Synthetic Judgments(1964) Cameron, Evan Wm.An essay confirming, in defiance of an opinion shared by many philosophers after Quine, that we may indeed, as Kant suggested, distinguish analytic from synthetic judgments but only by attending to how students could be taught how to use them (and the words and phrases of which they consist), and therewith how to use them differently, rather than by attempting to describe how differently they appear.Item Open Access On the Inductive Structure of Works of Art (Summary)(1970) Cameron, Evan Wm.A summary of the discussion and conclusions of the author's dissertation 'On the Inductive Structure of Works of Art', submitted and defended in May of 1970, comprising a revision of Chapter II amended at beginning and end to encompass material from the Introduction and Conclusion of the thesis, designed to enable readers to grasp the nature and consequences of its core conjecture – that works of art must be structured to be playable as inductive games if they are to be experienced powerfully – without attending to the logical and mathematical enquiries of Chapter I.Item Open Access On the Inductive Structure of Works of Art (Part II)(1970) Cameron, Evan Wm.Part II (of the two parts) of the dissertation of May 1970 within which author unpacks and defends the conjecture that works of art must be structured to be playable as inductive games if they are to be experienced powerfully – the core construal upon which his subsequent discussions of the nature, scope and limits of screenwriting were to rest. [Part II encompasses Chapter II of the thesis wherein the root structures of the narrative and non-narrative arts are examined, confirming the suggestion, followed by its Conclusion and Bibliography.]Item Open Access On the Inductive Structure of Works of Art (Part I)(1970) Cameron, Evan Wm.Part I (of two parts) of the dissertation of May 1970 within which author unpacks and defends the conjecture that works of art must be structured to be playable as inductive games if they are to be experienced powerfully – the core construal upon which his subsequent discussions of the nature, scope and limits of screenwriting were to rest. [Part I encompasses the Abstract and Preface of the thesis, and Chapter I with appendices – a formal excursion into pertinent aspects of probability theory and inductive logic.]Item Open Access On the Inductive Structure of Works of Art (Oral Examination Abstract)(1970) Cameron, Evan Wm.Extended abstract of the author's dissertation 'On the Inductive Structure of Works of Art', summarising its logical and artistic enquiries, as used by the members of the examining committee of the Graduate School of Boston University before whom it was defended in May of 1970.Item Open Access Performers Playing Themselves(2016) Crippen, MatthewAn enquiry by Matthew Crippen into how we encounter actors as we perceive them by means of a movies, having encountered them within other movies beforehand. After discussing how we use photographs, he concludes that we cannot help but register the actors as actors as we encounter them enacting rôles. Echoing what filmmakers have said and done and adding to classic accounts of Cavell, Santayana and others, he concludes that the very nature of movies well-nigh invites performers to play themselves.Item Open Access Art and Pragmatism: James and Dewey on the Reconstructive Presuppositions of Experience(2010) Crippen, MatthewDissertation by Matthew Crippen on the pragmatic construals by James and Dewey of how we experience works of art, supervised by EWC and defended in May of 2010, as submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy, Graduate Programme in Philosophy, York University, Toronto, Ontario.Item Open Access 'The Mind Hears': an Examination of Some Philosophical Perspectives on Musical Experience(2000) Bicknell, JeannetteDissertation by Jeanette Bicknell on the scope and nature of the 'levels of understanding' that determine how we experience music, supervised by EWC and defended in May of 2000, as submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy, Graduate Programme in Philosophy, York University, Toronto, Ontario.Item Open Access Francis Bacon and the Pragmatic Theory of Forms(1964) Cameron, Evan Wm.A summary of Francis Bacon's ontology of nature followed by a pragmatic reading of his theory of 'Forms', concluding that Bacon construed the mark of a true form to be its usefulness (or, as he put it when insisting upon the necessity of usefulness to the very being of a form, 'These two directions, the one active and the other contemplative, are one and the same thing; and what in operation is most useful, that in knowledge is most true.').Item Open Access How to Measure an Ideology(1984) Cameron, Evan Wm.A primer on the rudiments of the tough task of theorizing for film 'theorists' unable to distinguish theories from ideologies.Item Open Access McLuhan's Method: the Mad Hatter at Tea with Austin and Wittgenstein(1989) Cameron, Evan Wm.What was McLuhan doing? How was he doing it? Was it important? Within this essay I try to answer those questions by linking what he said and did, and how he did it, with the ways and means of the seemingly dissimilar philosophical project of Austin and Wittgenstein.